Skip to main content

Searching For Waldo

View the full forum here.

The federal role in reducing the inventory of foreclosed houses currently held by lenders is as challenging as searching for the cartoon character “Waldo” in the popular puzzle game, “Searching for Waldo.” Waldo is hidden in a mass of people, places and things that are so cluttered with obstructions that finding him takes time, perseverance, and patience, lots of patience.

As a by-product of the subprime lending bust, there is such a large inventory of foreclosed properties now weighing down the nation’s economy and hampering a sustained economic rebound (some $10 billion, an estimate by the Federal Reserve Bank).

In order to discuss possible solutions to the foreclosed properties inventory problem, one must accept certain economic assumptions. Namely, that the economy is not increasing in vital sectors to sustain increased growth, and that the housing industry is being hampered by the weight of the inventory of the foreclosed properties

What I mean by comparing “Finding Waldo” to finding a solution to the foreclosed housing inventory, is that foreclosed inventories are masked by the lack of accurate, consistent information on specific properties, cluttered by needless red tape, and obstructions  produced by the lack of institutional advocates and key housing industry interventions.

I must note, however, with great interest, the recent Federal Reserve Bank’s Report to Congress urging action in the housing market.  The Report gives cover to the Administration and Congress and related governmental entities to move on creative actions and to support a more aggressive approach to depleting the foreclosed inventory.

From my point of view, some of the actions that should be considered are: make selling foreclosed properties by realtors easier by drastically cutting “red tape” (specific red tape ideas is for another blog but ask any realtor); providing tax incentives and discounts for investors to purchase large blocks of properties for quick resale and possible use as rentals; create a national clearinghouse and centralized disposition entity for all foreclosed properties much like the RTC, which was created during the savings and loan debacle; increase interagency coordination of resources for distressed and foreclosed properties. According to a recent Wall Street Journal Editorial (January 10, 2012) there are some 16 federal programs that are currently available throughout the federal government dealing with the distressed housing issue; and, finally there needs to be a renewed effort at housing counseling, especially if foreclosed actions start rapidly moving through the system. The human aspect of this mess should not be treated like static while searching for “Waldo.”

Frank J. Vaccarella is President of Vaccarella & Associates, Consulting, LLP

Welcome to the BPC Housing Commission expert forum! This forum is intended to foster interactive and substantive discussion about pressing housing issues. Each month contributors from different parts of the housing sector will be invited to respond to a discussion topic. Guest posts will feature prominently on BPC’s website, as well as be shared regularly with Housing Commissioners to help inform their work.

Have a pressing question you’d like us to consider? Please leave it in the comments section. We encourage you and our expert bloggers to add comments, contributing to the national dialogue on solutions for the future of the housing sector.

Expert bloggers are not members of the BPC Housing Commission. Any views expressed on this forum do not necessarily represent the views of the Housing Commission, its Co-Chairs, or the Bipartisan Policy Center.

2012-01-20 00:00:00

Read Next