Border Apprehensions Fall for Children, Central Americans
The surge of children and families from Central America arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border may have been last year’s top immigration story. After the total number of apprehensions along the southwest border declined precipitously between fiscal year (FY) 2005 and FY 2011, the last fiscal year marked the third straight year that apprehensions rose. The increase was driven by migrants from countries other than Mexico. Even as apprehensions of Mexicans declined by about 170,000 between FY 2010 and FY 2014, apprehensions of people from other countries increased by more than 200,000.
Data on the first four months of the current fiscal year suggest that these trends may have reversed. According to The Wall Street Journal, apprehensions through the first four months of FY 2015 were about 22 percent lower than the same period in FY 2014 (97,667 versus 125,404). Reduced numbers of unaccompanied children (UC) and Central Americans appear responsible for this trend. However, it is unclear whether the reduced number of people being caught at the border means that fewer people are successfully entering illegally.
Child apprehensions fell for six straight months
Apprehensions of UCs at the U.S.-Mexico border skyrocketed over the past few years, from about 16,000 in FY 2011 to nearly 69,000 in FY 2014. For three consecutive years, from July 2011 to July 2014, more UC were apprehended each month than in the same month one year earlier. Over the past six months, this trend reversed: in every month between August 2014 and January 2015, fewer UC were apprehended than in the same month one year earlier (Figure 1). The number apprehended in January 2015?2,113?was the lowest monthly figure since September 2012.
Figure 1. Monthly UC apprehensions versus one and two years earlier.
Source: CBP data release (FY 2012-2014) and calculated from archived versions of CBP, “Southwest Border Unaccompanied Children” (FY 2015).
Overall, UC apprehensions have declined by 39 percent compared with the first four months of FY 2014; for all other types of apprehensions, the decline was 20 percent. The decline in UC apprehensions appears to be driven by reduced migration from El Salvador and Honduras. Compared with full-year figures for FY 2014, UCs from these countries appear to be arriving at a much slower pace than last year, while UCs from Guatemala and Mexico appear to be arriving at a similar rate.1
Central American apprehensions appear to be falling
Last year, for the first time ever, people from countries other than Mexico made up the majority of apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border. Through the first four months of FY 2015, the percentage of apprehended migrants not from Mexico fell to 40 percent?still much higher than historical averages, but below last year’s record pace (Figure 2). A large majority of non-Mexican migrants apprehended at the U.S.-Mexico border are Central American.
Because monthly data on Mexican versus non-Mexican apprehensions are not available, it is not possible to compare the first four months of FY 2015 to the first four months of previous years. This means the comparison does not reveal seasonal trends. For instance, if cold weather in the winter deters Central Americans from travelling longer distances, the proportion of non-Mexicans could climb during the summer months. If one were to lay aside potential seasonal effects and assume that the proportion of non-Mexicans did not change throughout FY 2014, the data would imply that non-Mexicans made up the large majority of the total decline in apprehensions.2
Figure 2. Percentage of non-Mexican apprehensions.
Source: CBP data release (FY 2012-FY 2014; FY 2015 non-Mexicans), The Wall Street Journal (FY 2015 total).
Does this mean fewer people are crossing the border?
The data don’t necessarily mean that fewer people are crossing the border. The trends do indicate that fewer UC are attempting to enter the country, and though seasonal figures would make the comparison more conclusive, it appears quite likely that fewer Central Americans are attempting to migrate than last year at this time. So it is reasonable to conclude that fewer people in these particular groups are trying to enter.
The numbers do not provide enough evidence to conclude whether more people are successfully entering the country. As explained in our recent report, Measuring the Metrics: Grading the Government on Immigration Enforcement, the number of apprehensions has historically been used as an indicator of many things it does not actually measure: namely, how many people are trying to cross the border and how many people succeed. The only thing it actually measures is how many times people are caught. To estimate the number of times people succeeded, it is necessary to combine the number of apprehensions with an estimate of the “probability of apprehension,” or the chance that someone will be caught. For example, if the probability of apprehension is 60 percent, and there were 600,000 apprehensions, one can estimate that there were 400,000 successful entries.
This is relevant to current trends because the groups leading the decline in apprehensions (UCs and Central Americans) may have had an especially high probability of apprehension last summer, when numerous reports described people turning themselves into the Border Patrol under the misguided belief that they would be given permission to stay. For this group of migrants?impossible to quantify, but certainly a significant portion of last year’s apprehensions?the probability of apprehension was 100 percent. All else being equal, fewer people turning themselves in would reduce the overall average probability of apprehension, meaning that a lower number of apprehensions could still imply the same number of successful border crossings.
The available data are a positive sign for those who were concerned about the surge of children and Central Americans last summer. However, as we concluded in Measuring the Metrics, more detailed data?in this case, monthly numbers on non-Mexican apprehensions and “known flow” estimates of successful illegal entries?would allow more certain conclusions about what the numbers mean.
1 In FY 2014, about 24 percent of UC apprehensions occurred in the first four months. In the first four months of this fiscal year, apprehensions of El Salvadorian UCs reached only 11 percent of last year’s level, and apprehensions of Honduran UCs were just 5 percent of last year’s level. By contrast, apprehensions of Guatemalan UCs have reached 21 percent of last year’s level, and of Mexican UCs have reached 23 percent of last year’s level. This comparison suggests that Salvadoran and Honduran apprehensions dropped, while Guatemalan and Mexican apprehensions occurred at a similar pace.
2 In the first four months of FY 2015, there were 97,667 southwest border apprehensions (WSJ), of whom 39,085 were not from Mexico (CBP) and 58,582 were from Mexico (calculated). In the first four months of FY 2014, there were 125,404 southwest border apprehensions (WSJ); that same year, 53 percent of apprehensions were of non-Mexicans (CBP). Applying the full-year percentage implies that in the first four months of FY 2014, 59,324 apprehended migrants were Mexican and 66,080 were not Mexican. Using these figures as estimates for the first four months of FY 2014 implies that non-Mexicans constituted a large majority of the overall decline.
Support Research Like This
With your support, BPC can continue to fund important research like this by combining the best ideas from both parties to promote health, security, and opportunity for all Americans.Donate Now
Join Our Mailing List
BPC drives principled and politically viable policy solutions through the power of rigorous analysis, painstaking negotiation, and aggressive advocacy.