Citizens for Political Reform are informed, opinionated Americans committed to understanding and fixing the partisan divide. Sign up to receive updates and find out how you can join us and improve our democracy.
Posted March 27, 2012
Arguments hinged on the Affordable Care Act's most controversial component, the individual mandate
Today the Supreme Court moved on to the second of their three full days of oral arguments debating the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Yesterday the Court considered the applicability of the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA). Today’s arguments address the most controversial aspect of PPACA: the individual mandate to acquire health insurance coverage. When the mandate starts in 2014, anyone who does not have health care coverage will have to pay a fine. At the same time, however, new rules for insurers will require them to issue coverage to any individual who applies, regardless of health status. The federal government is arguing that the individual mandate is a method of regulating commerce and economic activity, while opponents argue that the mandate represents an unprecedented level of intrusion and directly compels individuals to act, meaning that it regulates inactivity.
A complete transcript of today’s arguments is available here.
With news and commentary coming in fast on this issue, here are a few articles and blogs we’re reading:
Related Posts
Comments
Post new comment